The Lord of Misrule (1994) by Paul Halter


lord of.jpg

After I recently acquired copies of Helen McCloy’s Through a Glass, Darkly and Paul Gallico’s Too Many Ghosts, I had fully expected to read and review one of the two. But fate works in mysterious ways, and while I was at the library picking up TMG, I noticed that they had recently bought The Lord of Misrule, and so I succumbed to temptation and checked it out, knowing full well that the slim volume would be completed before any other book on my TBR pile would get a chance to plead their case.

The Mansfields are seemingly cursed. For years they have been haunted by the apparition of a spirit known as the Lord of Misrule and several previous deaths in the family, along with the fact that their fortune has been slowly declining. All is not lost however, as the patriarch of the family has managed to arrange the marriage of his daughter Sibyl to a wealthy businessman by the name of Samuel Pigott. As Christmas draws near, the haunting of their ancestral manor begins to increase, and Catherine Pigott decides to hire Owen Burns as a private detective who can sniff out who’s behind all of the strange happenings. He however sends a friend by the name of Achilles Stock in his place and Stock will soon bare witness to a series of extraordinary events. The Lord of Misrule starts appearing and fleeing more frequently, séances are held that announce the presence of an avenging spirit, and a impossible murder occurs outdoors that starkly contrasts the indoor impossible death of one of the Mansfields.

The main fallacy of The Lord of Misrule is it’s over reliance on coincidence. Nearly every aspect of the solution needs a good dosage of it to work in combination with unbelievable amounts of luck. The second impossible murder has a brilliant solution, but the fact that it relies on the witnesses deciding to descend at such a exact moment in order for it to be impossible harms its overall construction and execution. The first murder is inundated in ridiculous actions on the part of the victim, actions that really make no sense in the context of the solution, actions that make the victim in The Problem of the Wire Cage seem just a little bit less, well, stupid. The other murders in the past also derive several parts of their solutions from coincidence or misunderstanding, and though one is still good, the other is a miserable flop. The motivations and threading behind the plot are also obscured by all of these different characters dipping their grubby hands into the honey pot, making certain fascinating events end up having mundane or unsatisfactory solutions. However, the core elements behind the impossibilities and culprit (or culprits) are very good, and though some parts of both are very see through, they come together in the end to form a coherent and entertaining resolution. However, as pointed out by others, you can’t figure out the full picture on your own. Too much of this either relies on coincidence or is too convoluted for a normal person to solve, something that isn’t exactly fair play.

The most disappointing feature of the story was the secret (or rather secrets) behind the titular Lord of Misrule. The core idea is genuinely bad in execution and presentation and it leaves a sour taste in the mouth. It is fairly clued, but Halter could have easily improved the conceit with a little bit of time and effort. The explanations behind the lord’s appearance and struggle during the first murder are the worst in the book, relying on strange psychology that doesn’t gratify the original situations while also being a cheat. It’s something that I’ve encountered in Halter’s works in the past (creating fascinating side mysteries that don’t live up to their premises), and it feels like Halter only added it in order to have another impossibility on top of all the others.

The characters here are more paper thin than usual, with the woman being objects of desire for the leading men and the men being literal human props created simply because they were needed to furnish the plot. Even Owen Burns doesn’t come to life. He’s really just cardboard thats characterized by his eccentricities and he brings nothing interesting to the table besides the solution. Halter would improve on him in later books, but in his debut he fails to make a impression at all. Achilles isn’t any better, with him fawning over most of the woman in the story instead of doing much real sleuthing.

In terms of the positives, Halter doesn’t suffocate or strangle you with the atmosphere here. He delicately sprinkles it evenly throughout the novel and uses it as a mechanism to concentrate horror and tension, creating some of the best moments in the story. The tinkling of bells soon becomes a sinister omen and the legend of the Lord of Misrule slowly grows and grows, with his spirit entrapping all of the residents in the manor, who may be next on his growing list of killings. The seances defy expectation and don’t give much atmosphere,  instead providing interesting scenes that help drive the story to its inevitable conclusion, helping set up murders and solutions to puzzles and not inducing any chills.

The story is a fantastic homage to a the Golden Age. Its filled to the brim with classic tropes like séances, references to famous sleuths, and has situations and solutions inspired by classics of the genre like The Hollow Man (it is in fact heavily inspired by THM, with the first impossible murder clearly showing this). It still maintains that whimsical atmosphere that I’m accustomed to in Halter’s mysteries and it fully invests the reader, even if some of the sections would have put you off if it was by any other author.

Like all of his stories, it flies by when placed into the hands of the hungry reader. Halter doesn’t focus on the characters and instead stuffs the book with developments in the plot, making it have no filler whatsoever. Everything has its place in the narrative, and while the end result isn’t perfect, Halter still manages to tie nearly everything together with a solution that at the very least fulfills one’s need for resolution. Halter doesn’t always clue fairly here, but those he does give us are usually gorgeous, with the clue about the whistling noise being a favorite as it’s so obviously see through and yet so opaque. Halter also ends off the story with one of his best tricks, the last line that reveals all, and it truly is haunting, adding a spark of emotion that ends off the book in a incredibly saddening and competent way.

This is an interesting Halter, and is the most polarizing one that I’ve read. It has it’s ups, it has it’s downs, but it still retains the classic elements that I’ve come to adore from Paul Halter. Not a classic, but a decent work from a author whose works I love. A 3.5/5 rating, accompanied with the sad news that I won’t be reading Halter for a few more months (Rationing always occurs in times of scarcity!).

Other Opinions:

The Invisible Event



4 thoughts on “The Lord of Misrule (1994) by Paul Halter

    1. It does come in for a lot of flack, and I know there are aspects of it I can understand…but it’s also sort of a throwback to a couple of genre classics and I feel this gets overlooked.

      Yes, the indoor murder is going to underwhelm a little, but the explanation is one that was used more than a little way-back-when at the initiation of the impossible crime, and given Halter’s pedigree before this was published I can’t believe it’s an accident or due to a lack of imagination that he was using something so old and moth-eaten…but, well.

      I agree with the above about the atmosphere not being used to batter you about the head, and I found this slightly more disquieting for the restraint shown here. And, yeah, the Christianna Brand-ish final line explanation is a doozy.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. The solution to the indoor murder is nearly as old as the genre itself, but Halter does at least try to add his own spin on it, and though the core idea is painfully obvious, it’s also quite obvious that Halter probably used that solution because he wanted to make his homage to THM more of a homage.

        The second impossibility is brilliant and original, and is also better than the source material in THM, no mean feat, given my love of that solution.

        Halter either goes meta on us in his endings (The Fourth Door or The Madman’s Room), stereotypically Carrian (The Man Who Loved Clouds), or Brand like with the final, haunting line (Here and The Vampire Tree). I enjoy the last category the most, but maybe thats just my (fairly obvious) bias showing 😉 .

        The Lord of Misrule is very overlooked, and it isn’t as bad as some people make it out to be. It’s kinda like The Vampire Tree in a sense, interesting in core theme with good impossibilities, but other aspects of the plot just fail.


      2. The outdoor murder here is superior to the one in THM in my estimation, too. I have so many issues wth the solution Carr proposes, but even without them Halter still runs rings around him.

        And, hey, if you’re not a fan of the meta endings a la The Madman’s Room — which I personally really enjoyed — then brace yourself for The Picture from the Past.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s